Thursday, April 20, 2006
Sitting with the Standing Committee
Back in the Office of the Dude in Charge of Seminarians (I think it's actually called the Office for Ministry Development, but I like my title better) I was benignly admonished that I should really be addressing my ember day letters more formally - i.e. "Dear Bishop Lipscomb", instead of my current practice, "Dear Bishop John". Now, I know Bishop John and we've interacted for a long time on a fairly regular basis. I feel comfortable calling him "John", or "Bishop John". But I guess I'll follow the admonishment - righteousness for righteousness' sake. It's funny though, because when I first came to seminary I was very formal with professors, calling them "Dr. Meyers," or "Prof. Adam," or "Fr. Dally," or "Dean Lemler." But, they pretty much beat that out of me so that now we are all on first name bases. From college, I was used to calling professors by the honorific + last name (except in the theater department, where that was frowned upon - first names only there). I got to seminary and it was a culture switch. Now, I've navigated that switch successfully, and the Dude in Charge of Seminarians says start using honorifics + last names again. I guess I'll do that - for a time. But when I get to know someone, I don't like to be so stuffy and formal all the time. I never want my friends to call me "Fr. Whitley", and I'm not even sure how I feel about that with future parishioners! In any event, that's just a minor thing, really.
-R
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2565d/2565dd2f53e29e4e869efab95f6224cc37e2019e" alt=""
4 Comments:
You know, your Dude is sounding a bit officious to me.
I always addressed my Ember Day letters simply "Dear Ed," as that was how he introduced himself to me initially, years ago. And no one ever seemed to mind, least of all my bishop.
You might ask your bishop his preference in the matter, before you unexpectedly get more formal and possibly leave the man wondering what he did to offend you.
By Jane Ellen+, at 11:37 AM
I'm with both of y'all here. My bishop goes by Bishop Gibbs, but he made his preference very clear from the day he got here. The previous bishop was Stew, or Bp Stew... but really mostly Stew. Just because he is a bishop doesn't mean he believes in the formal address.
Of course.. you could just switch to "your Grace"...
By Susie/Nueva Cantora, at 12:35 PM
I prefer Ted Tripp's address of the bishop: his purpleness
By 12:44 PM
, at
I'm late on this one -- I usually am -- But I would like to point out that jane ellen is right (as usual), ask the good bishop how he prefers to be addressed.
I would also like to point out that, although your title for the Office for Ministry Development (Dude in Charge of Seminarians) may be better, it has a rather .... um .... less-than-satisfactory acronym. But then ... maybe you meant it that way.
Peace, Dude ;)
and many congratulations.
By Reverend Ref +, at 7:50 PM